<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything You Should Know About FW Fins.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/</link>
	<description>Elite Windsurfing Training, Racing, Tactics, Design by Professional Windsurfer Sean O&#039;Brien</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kashy</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-74196</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kashy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-74196</guid>
		<description>I have not sailed the new 167W yet, but Jesper reported that a Kashy K70XS-T0 and -T2 work really well and that even smaller fins could work well too. I think the new cutouts that go further forward allow the board to ride freer and thus even though the board is wide it does not need a huge fin. The big fins will certainly work since the board is wide, but may not be the fastest especially for really fast guys like Jesper.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not sailed the new 167W yet, but Jesper reported that a Kashy K70XS-T0 and -T2 work really well and that even smaller fins could work well too. I think the new cutouts that go further forward allow the board to ride freer and thus even though the board is wide it does not need a huge fin. The big fins will certainly work since the board is wide, but may not be the fastest especially for really fast guys like Jesper.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-72881</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-72881</guid>
		<description>What is the lastest info you hv on fins, so many good brands 
Like Kashy , F4 , Z-Fins, VMG ....... so confusing to choose what is the best. ( within budget ) 

The tails ( SB 167Wide .... ) are now wider than before, does that mean what use to be yr light wind fin can be use as yr hi-wind fin ? 

What fins are you using now ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the lastest info you hv on fins, so many good brands<br />
Like Kashy , F4 , Z-Fins, VMG &#8230;&#8230;. so confusing to choose what is the best. ( within budget ) </p>
<p>The tails ( SB 167Wide &#8230;. ) are now wider than before, does that mean what use to be yr light wind fin can be use as yr hi-wind fin ? </p>
<p>What fins are you using now ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-47319</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-47319</guid>
		<description>Angelos, I&#039;ve never done a direct comparison of these two fins, although I have owned them both at separate times... 

I would say that the K73 would be much better than the R20. The R20 is not a bad fin, but it generally doesn&#039;t create as much lift as some of the other fins out there; the F162 is quite a flat-sailing board and you need a fin that helps lift the nose of the board to get it to fly ... the combination of R20 / F162 doesn&#039;t actually do that so well ... 

There&#039;s generally another year of development in the K73 also, as it was built a year later than the R20, so I believe it&#039;s taken advantage of newer ideas and technologies available in fin making that the older Deboichet&#039;s don&#039;t have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelos, I&#8217;ve never done a direct comparison of these two fins, although I have owned them both at separate times&#8230; </p>
<p>I would say that the K73 would be much better than the R20. The R20 is not a bad fin, but it generally doesn&#8217;t create as much lift as some of the other fins out there; the F162 is quite a flat-sailing board and you need a fin that helps lift the nose of the board to get it to fly &#8230; the combination of R20 / F162 doesn&#8217;t actually do that so well &#8230; </p>
<p>There&#8217;s generally another year of development in the K73 also, as it was built a year later than the R20, so I believe it&#8217;s taken advantage of newer ideas and technologies available in fin making that the older Deboichet&#8217;s don&#8217;t have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-46309</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-46309</guid>
		<description>How would you describe the k73/70 in comparison with the R20.
I currently riding SB 162 with R20 and R19.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you describe the k73/70 in comparison with the R20.<br />
I currently riding SB 162 with R20 and R19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-17797</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-17797</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

Website looks great! Thanks for posting here. Feel free to post some updates here when the event goes ahead, I&#039;m sure a lot of readers will be interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>Website looks great! Thanks for posting here. Feel free to post some updates here when the event goes ahead, I&#8217;m sure a lot of readers will be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kashy</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-17796</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kashy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-17796</guid>
		<description>Hi All, I finally went ahead and put together a Web site. The main reason was to publicize my up coming event, but I went ahead and added a link to my design brief. 
Take a look. (And Enjoy the Ride)
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All, I finally went ahead and put together a Web site. The main reason was to publicize my up coming event, but I went ahead and added a link to my design brief.<br />
Take a look. (And Enjoy the Ride)<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fins!!!! &#171; Pieter&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-17028</link>
		<dc:creator>Fins!!!! &#171; Pieter&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-17028</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted in 1    I found another great article at Carbon Sugar today! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted in 1    I found another great article at Carbon Sugar today! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuning Your Kit for High Wind&#160;&#124;&#160;CarbonSugar.com &#8211; The Secrets of High Performance Windsurfing</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-16313</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuning Your Kit for High Wind&#160;&#124;&#160;CarbonSugar.com &#8211; The Secrets of High Performance Windsurfing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-16313</guid>
		<description>[...] If you want to learn more about fins then check our previous article on &#8220;Everything You Should Know About Formula Fins&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you want to learn more about fins then check our previous article on &#8220;Everything You Should Know About Formula Fins&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-11302</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-11302</guid>
		<description>Hi Nemeth,

I haven&#039;t tested the LWR (only HWR) so can&#039;t give you any insight in to the fins etc. I think its best to decide on the Starboards based on their development models:

HWR - development of the 161
LWR - development of the 160

Both boards will be great but have different riding characteristics based on their predecessor boards having different riding characteristics.

If you are currently riding a 160, I&#039;d suggest going with the LWR as it will have a similar style (obviously with improvements!) so you&#039;ll already be used to it and most likely the fins you currently have will work great with the new board.  Don&#039;t read too much in to the &#039;size&#039; of the boards ... 168L is only 7L more than the 162, I think you&#039;ll hardly even notice 7L in a formula board!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nemeth,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tested the LWR (only HWR) so can&#8217;t give you any insight in to the fins etc. I think its best to decide on the Starboards based on their development models:</p>
<p>HWR &#8211; development of the 161<br />
LWR &#8211; development of the 160</p>
<p>Both boards will be great but have different riding characteristics based on their predecessor boards having different riding characteristics.</p>
<p>If you are currently riding a 160, I&#8217;d suggest going with the LWR as it will have a similar style (obviously with improvements!) so you&#8217;ll already be used to it and most likely the fins you currently have will work great with the new board.  Don&#8217;t read too much in to the &#8216;size&#8217; of the boards &#8230; 168L is only 7L more than the 162, I think you&#8217;ll hardly even notice 7L in a formula board!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/everything-you-should-know-about-fw-fins/#comment-11286</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=46#comment-11286</guid>
		<description>Does anybody have have any information how there fins are laid up.
What weight carbon, what direction the cloth is laid in etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody have have any information how there fins are laid up.<br />
What weight carbon, what direction the cloth is laid in etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.carbonsugar.com @ 2012-02-04 22:49:03 by W3 Total Cache -->
