<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ultimate FW Board Tuning Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/</link>
	<description>Elite Windsurfing Training, Racing, Tactics, Design by Professional Windsurfer Sean O&#039;Brien</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:20:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-15190</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-15190</guid>
		<description>@ eduardo - great! 

Unfortunately, we probably won&#039;t see any PD boards in Australia, as we basically never saw any F2 boards here either. Basically a Starboard (and now JP) country over here. I was the only one with Gaastra boards and brought them in from Europe. 

Would be cool if you could share some info on the PD or maybe some pics? All I&#039;ve seen is that post Patrick made on ContinentSeven about the board a while back ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ eduardo &#8211; great! </p>
<p>Unfortunately, we probably won&#8217;t see any PD boards in Australia, as we basically never saw any F2 boards here either. Basically a Starboard (and now JP) country over here. I was the only one with Gaastra boards and brought them in from Europe. </p>
<p>Would be cool if you could share some info on the PD or maybe some pics? All I&#8217;ve seen is that post Patrick made on ContinentSeven about the board a while back &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eduardo</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-15105</link>
		<dc:creator>eduardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-15105</guid>
		<description>the PATRIK BOARD is unreal!!!!!!!!!!

have you guys been able to try it?

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the PATRIK BOARD is unreal!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>have you guys been able to try it?</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-15074</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-15074</guid>
		<description>@ Hogar - 

Yes, we have a pre-production JP Formula board here in Australia which I got a chance to ride only briefly. It&#039;s incredibly wide in the tail, almost like an F2, but amazingly in strong winds its really controllable in chop and with the double-chicken is quite nice off the wind. Upwind, with the wide tail it has great angle and is comfortable.

It needs a big fin though because the tail is so wide. My only complaint was that in light winds it seemed a bit &#039;sticky&#039; when trying to get on the plane. I think again, that&#039;s because of the wide tail and maybe the cutouts are a little too big to get the surface area required for early planing. I think it will be a popular board this year for sure though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Hogar &#8211; </p>
<p>Yes, we have a pre-production JP Formula board here in Australia which I got a chance to ride only briefly. It&#8217;s incredibly wide in the tail, almost like an F2, but amazingly in strong winds its really controllable in chop and with the double-chicken is quite nice off the wind. Upwind, with the wide tail it has great angle and is comfortable.</p>
<p>It needs a big fin though because the tail is so wide. My only complaint was that in light winds it seemed a bit &#8217;sticky&#8217; when trying to get on the plane. I think again, that&#8217;s because of the wide tail and maybe the cutouts are a little too big to get the surface area required for early planing. I think it will be a popular board this year for sure though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hogar</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-15014</link>
		<dc:creator>Hogar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-15014</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean, did you have a chance to try the JP formula? Any comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean, did you have a chance to try the JP formula? Any comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12 examples of excellent blog post formatting and styling &#124; Web Design Byte</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-11989</link>
		<dc:creator>12 examples of excellent blog post formatting and styling &#124; Web Design Byte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-11989</guid>
		<description>[...] 12. Carbon Sugar   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 12. Carbon Sugar   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean OBrien</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-11347</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-11347</guid>
		<description>@ Phil

I think the way Starboard has marketed their boards this season is really confusing as lot&#039;s of people have been asking the same question!

Don&#039;t think of them as a light-wind board and a high-wind board as that&#039;s not correct. Their names are supposed to mean Lightweight Racing (LWR) and Heavyweight Racing (HWR) however I don&#039;t think its correct to choose from these boards based on your bodyweight either!

The LWR is a development of the F160 and the HWR is a development of the F161. Both the 160 and 161 were great boards but they have different riding characteristics (see some comments about this here - http://www.star-board.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3057).

If you have previously used Starboard boards, I would advise you to make the decision based on whether you like the 160 or 161. The 160 being a looser, free&#039;r board in the water and arguably faster in high winds (160 = LWR) or the 161 being a more flatter-riding, more locked in board (161 = HWR).

Hope that doesn&#039;t confuse things more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Phil</p>
<p>I think the way Starboard has marketed their boards this season is really confusing as lot&#8217;s of people have been asking the same question!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think of them as a light-wind board and a high-wind board as that&#8217;s not correct. Their names are supposed to mean Lightweight Racing (LWR) and Heavyweight Racing (HWR) however I don&#8217;t think its correct to choose from these boards based on your bodyweight either!</p>
<p>The LWR is a development of the F160 and the HWR is a development of the F161. Both the 160 and 161 were great boards but they have different riding characteristics (see some comments about this here &#8211; <a href="http://www.star-board.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3057)" rel="nofollow">http://www.star-board.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3057)</a>.</p>
<p>If you have previously used Starboard boards, I would advise you to make the decision based on whether you like the 160 or 161. The 160 being a looser, free&#8217;r board in the water and arguably faster in high winds (160 = LWR) or the 161 being a more flatter-riding, more locked in board (161 = HWR).</p>
<p>Hope that doesn&#8217;t confuse things more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-11328</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-11328</guid>
		<description>I have a question.
Starboard will come 2010 with 2 fw boards.
One for lighter winds and the other for more wind.
I dont understand why is the light wind version with less volumen und smaller?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question.<br />
Starboard will come 2010 with 2 fw boards.<br />
One for lighter winds and the other for more wind.<br />
I dont understand why is the light wind version with less volumen und smaller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Examples of Excellent Blog Post Formatting and Styling &#124; Webdesign Creative</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-11188</link>
		<dc:creator>Examples of Excellent Blog Post Formatting and Styling &#124; Webdesign Creative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-11188</guid>
		<description>[...] Carbon Sugar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carbon Sugar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Examples of Excellent Blog Post Formatting and Styling &#124; Vandelay Design Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-11147</link>
		<dc:creator>Examples of Excellent Blog Post Formatting and Styling &#124; Vandelay Design Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-11147</guid>
		<description>[...] Carbon Sugar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carbon Sugar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gasper</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonsugar.com/design/the-ultimate-fw-board-tuning-guide/#comment-11104</link>
		<dc:creator>Gasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonsugar.com/?p=151#comment-11104</guid>
		<description>@Mats

I am from Slovenia. Could you contact me by email?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mats</p>
<p>I am from Slovenia. Could you contact me by email?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/14 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via carbonsugar.aus120.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.carbonsugar.com @ 2010-07-29 17:30:30 -->